CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL
PSYCHOLOGY
Los Angeles
Driving Home: Parental
Commuting
and Depressive Symptoms
in Young Adolescents
A dissertation submitted in
partial
satisfaction of the requirements for the
degree of
Doctor of Philosophy in
Psychology
by
Gregory E. Hamlin
1999
Copyright by
Gregory E. Hamlin
1999
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL
PSYCHOLOGY
Los Angeles Campus
The dissertation of Gregory E. Hamlin,
directed and approved by
the candidate’s Committee, has been accepted
by the Faculty of the
California School of Professional Psychology
in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the Degree
of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Dissertation Committee:
Karen M. Finello, Ph.D.,
Chairperson
Terece Bell, Ph.D.
John Bakaly, Ph.D.
1999
DEDICATION.................................................................................................................
TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................
LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................
LIST OF APPENDICES................................................................................................
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................................
VITA...............................................................................................................................
ABSTRACT OF THE
DISSERTATION.....................................................................
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Early Adolescent Depression and
Parental Commuting Behavior......................................
Statement of the
Problem....................................................................................................
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW
OF THE LITERATURE....................................................................................................................
Overview.............................................................................................................................
Commuting Stress and the
Family.......................................................................................
Commuting Behavior in Southern
California...................................................................
Commuting Behavior in Los Angeles
County and Ventura County...............................
The Nature and Effects of Commuting
Stress...............................................................
Stress Versus Strain....................................................................................................
Salient Factors in the Stress-Strain
Relationship for the Commuter...........................
Behavioral, Emotional and
Attitudinal Effects..........................................................
The Koslowsky Model of Commuting
Stress................................................................
Early Adolescent
Depression.............................................................................................
Depression as a Symptom, Syndrome or
Disorder:
Diagnostic and Classification
Issues..............................................................................
Prevalence Rates of
Depression.....................................................................................
Aspects of Early Adolescent
Depression Relevant to Commuting................................
Attachment, Loss, and
Mourning...............................................................................
Inadequate Coping and
Cognition..............................................................................
Emotional Regulation and
Vulnerability to Depression.............................................
Stress, Anxiety, and
Depression.................................................................................
Life Events and
Difficulties.......................................................................................
Salient Features of Early
Adolescent Development..........................................................
Cognitive Development and the
Emotional Experience of the Early
Adolescent.........
Piaget’s View of Pre-adolescence and
Adolescence..................................................
Flavell’s Amendments to the
Developmental Trends Noted by Piaget......................
Friendship and Cognitive
Development.....................................................................
Social Development and the Emotional
Experience of the Early Adolescent...............
Attachments................................................................................................................
Friendships with
Peers:
Needs and Developmental Tasks.........................................
Family Life Cycle Changes and
Developmental Vulnerability..................................
Family Stressors, Social Development
and Early Adolescence: Possible
Implications of Long Parent Commutes
for Early Adolescent Development............
The Compensating Resources Model
of Commuting Stress
and Early Adolescent Depression.........................................................................................................................
Definitions and Terms.......................................................................................................
Definitions Used in Research
Planning..........................................................................
Key Definitions Used in Data
Analysis.........................................................................
Research Hypotheses.........................................................................................................
CHAPTER 3
METHODS
Sample...............................................................................................................................
Description of the
Sample..............................................................................................
General Approach to Data
Collection............................................................................
Inclusion Criteria............................................................................................................
Original Inclusion
Criteria...........................................................................................
Revised Inclusion
Criteria...........................................................................................
Sample Size and Power
Analysis...................................................................................
Design................................................................................................................................
Setting................................................................................................................................
Variables............................................................................................................................
Variables for Hypothesis
Testing...................................................................................
Parental Commuting
Variables.......................................................................................
Parent Demographic
Variables.......................................................................................
Variables Pertaining to Student
Participants..................................................................
Measures............................................................................................................................
Parent Questionnaire......................................................................................................
Children’s Depression Inventory
(CDI).........................................................................
Friendship Qualities
Scale..............................................................................................
Procedures for Data
Collection.........................................................................................
Instructions to
Participants.............................................................................................
Debriefing.......................................................................................................................
Incentives for
Participation............................................................................................
Human Rights
Protection..................................................................................................
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS
Data Screening and Important
Transformations................................................................
Planned Analyses For Which the
Sample Characteristics Precluded Testing.................
Main Comparison and Analyses for
Hypothesis
Testing............................................
Planned Post Hoc
Analyses..........................................................................................
Child Friendship, Commute Time and
Depression...................................................
Commute Stress, Commute Length and
Depression................................................
Additional Exploratory Post Hoc
Analyses....................................................................
Variables Used in Exploratory
Analyses......................................................................
The Relationship Between Parental
Commuting and Child Depressive Symptoms....
The Relationship Between Child
Gender and Child Depressive Symptoms...............
The Relationship Between
Compensating Resources and Depressive
Symptoms.......
A Logistic Regression Model for
Predicting the Presence of Depressive
Symptoms..
CHAPTER 5
DISCUSSION
Overview of Findings......................................................................................................
The Implications of Revised Inclusion
Criteria for Hypothesis Testing.....................
Parental Commuting and Young
Adolescent Depression............................................
Compensating Resources, Gender and
Young Adolescent Depression.......................
A Preliminary Model for Predicting
Depressive Symptoms........................................
Descriptive Information Regarding
the Sample..............................................................
Findings Interpreted in Light of
Methodological Considerations and the
Literature.....
The Stress and Strain of Commuting
and the Home Environment..............................
Parental Commute Time and Young
Adolescent Depression......................................
Compensating Resources, Gender and
Young Adolescent Depression.......................
The Prediction Model and Adolescent
Development..................................................
An Evaluation of the Compensating
Resources Model...................................................
Assumptions and
Limitations..........................................................................................
Directions for Future
Research........................................................................................
REFERENCES...............................................................................................................
APPENDICES................................................................................................................
LIST OF TABLES
Table
|
1
|
|
Frequency of Participants by
School……………………………70
|
|
2
|
|
Marital Status of Parent
Participants……………………………71
|
|
3
|
|
Parent Employment
Type……………………………………….72
|
|
4
|
|
Gross Annual Income for
Household…………………………..73
|
|
5
|
|
Continuous Variables
Describing the
Sample…………………..75
|
|
6
|
|
Dichotomous Variables
Describing the
Sample…………………77
|
|
7
|
|
Grade Level of Child
Participants……………………………….79
|
|
8
|
|
Relationship of Parent
Respondent to
Participating
Child………………………………………………80
|
|
9
|
|
Relationship of After-school
Caregiver
to Participating
Child……………………………………………81
|
|
10
|
|
Gender of Participating
Students………………………………..82
|
|
11
|
|
Commuting Variables Created
By
Computed
Transformations……………………………………100
|
|
12
|
|
Depressive Symptoms as a
Dichotomous
Variable………………………………………………………..102
|
|
13
|
|
Married and Unmarried
Groups……………………………….103
|
|
14
|
|
Intercorrelations Between
Children’s Depression
Inventory T-scores and
Parental Commuting
Variables………110
|
|
15
|
|
Intercorrelations Between
Children’s Depression
Inventory T-scores and
Compensating Resource
Variables………………………………………………………113
|
|
16
|
|
Intercorrelations Between
Children’s Depression
Inventory T-scores and
Compensating Resource
Variables for Male
Children…………………………………..115
|
|
17
|
|
Intercorrelations Between
Children’s Depression
Inventory T-scores and
Compensating Resource
Variables for Female
Children…………………………………116
|
|
18
|
|
Logistic Regression Analysis
Predicting Presence
of Depressive
Symptoms………………………………………119
|
|
19
|
|
Classification Table for
Logistic Regression
Analysis Predicting Presence
of Depressive
Symptoms……………………………………………………..120
|
Figure
|
1
|
|
The Compensating Resources
Model of
Commuting Impact on
Adolescents……………………………..58
|
List of Appendices
Appendix A
Letter to School District Officials: Invitation and
Incentives to Participate in a Research
Project
Appendix B
Invitation/Parent Consent Form.................................................................................................................................
Appendix
C
Parent Questionnaire
Appendix
D
Detailed Procedure for Giving Instructions to Student
Participants........................................................................
191
Appendix
E
Debriefing
of Student Participants.................................................................................................................................
193
Appendix
F
Friendship Qualities Scale
195
Appendix
G
Children’s Depression Inventory.................................................................................................................................
198
Many people contributed to the completion of this
study and I wish to acknowledge their various
contributions. The steady, loving
encouragement of my wife Christine allowed this
research project to survive the innumerable
logistical and motivational challenges inherent in
doctoral work. My three children,
Nathan, Rochelle, and Alyson, gave me perspective as
each of them passed through the young adolescent
years while I commuted to work and conducted this
research. I feel special
gratitude to my daughter Rochelle for her careful
persistence in entering the lion’s share of the
collected data into the computer – all during a
record Southern California heat wave in a house with
a broken air conditioner. My family taught me
the joy of ‘having a life’ while in graduate school
and kept me sane in its most challenging
moments.
I am grateful for the administrators, principals,
teachers, and office staff of the districts
represented by the following schools: Placerita Junior
High School, La Mesa Junior High School, Challenger
Middle School, Jefferson Middle School, Castaic
Middle School, Mountain View Elementary School,
Rosedell Elementary School, and Emblem Elementary
School.
Most importantly, I appreciate the participation of
the students and their parents who were the “stars”
of this study.
Lise Meyers, my assistant during the data collection
phase, helped with numerous organizational details
including preparation of test materials, phone calls,
correspondence, crowd control at the schools, and
even ordering pizza for the student
participants.
I would like to thank my committee members John
Bakaly, Ph.D., Terece Bell, Ph.D., and Karen M.
Finello, Ph.D. Dr. Bakely gave
wise advice and encouragement concerning various
aspects of keeping the big picture in
mind.
Dr. Bell gave timely encouragement and methodological
advice at critical junctures in the planning and
writing of this dissertation. As the chairperson
of the committee, Dr. Finello’s encouragement and
insight helped get this project off the ground and
saw it to completion. Her patience and
research expertise allowed the entire research
project to take shape. Her vision for
applied research that gives something back to the
community has made a lasting impression on me and
guided me during the data collection
process.
Her close attention to the written expression of each
successive draft resulted in countless useful tips
and helpful comments.
A special thanks to Joan Murray, Ph.D. is in
order.
Dr. Murray’s gracious willingness to be available to
discuss numerous statistical issues not only
contributed greatly to this study but also fueled my
interest in statistical analysis.
Finally, I thank God for the numerous friends and
relatives who have encouraged me along the
way.
Their kinds words and tangible support cannot be
measured.
|
October 16, 1956
|
--
|
Born, Burbank,
California
|
|
1978
|
--
|
Bachelor of Arts in
Philosophy and Religious Studies,
Westmont College, Santa Barbara,
California
|
|
1982
|
--
|
Master of Divinity, Honors
Program, Westminster Theological
Seminary, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
|
|
1994-1995
|
--
|
Practicum Student, Santa
Clarita Child and Family Development
Center, Santa Clarita,
California
|
|
1995
|
--
|
Master of Arts in
Psychology, California School of
Professional Psychology, Los Angeles,
California
|
|
1996-1998
|
--
|
Registered Psychological
Assistant (PSB24197) to Richard A.
Blackmon, Ph.D., (California License
PSY9700), Westlake Village,
California
|
|
1997-1998
|
--
|
Psychology Intern,
Counseling and Psychological
Services, California State
University, Northridge,
California
|
|
1998-1999
|
--
|
Psychology Intern,
Counseling and Psychological
Services, Mount St. Mary’s College,
Brentwood, California
|
|
1999
|
--
|
Doctor of Philosophy in
Clinical Psychology, California
School of Professional Psychology,
Los Angeles, California
|
Driving Home: Parental Commuting
and Depressive Symptoms in Young
Adolescents
by
Gregory E. Hamlin
Doctor of Philosophy in
Psychology
California School of Professional
Psychology
1999
Karen M. Finello, Ph.D.,
Chairperson
The empirical literature concerned with commuting
stress thus far has neglected to focus on the
emotional adjustment of the children of commuting
parents who work at full-time jobs. The purpose of this
correlational, exploratory study was to examine the
relationship between parental commute variables and
the symptoms of depression endorsed by their young
adolescent children. Specifically, this
study examined 146 families as to how the roundtrip
commute time of parents related to the scores of
young adolescents who completed the Children’s
Depression Inventory. Related commuting
variables were also examined as were adolescent
scores on the Friendship Quality Scale. Participants were
recruited from public Middle Schools, Junior High
Schools, and Elementary Schools located in suburban
areas of greater Los Angeles. One parent per
family completed a paper and pencil questionnaire
assessing the commuting characteristics of each
parent in the home as well as demographic
characteristics. Their children (one
6th, 7th, or
8th grade student from each family)
completed the Children’s Depression Inventory and the
Friendship Quality Scale. It was hypothesized
that longer commute times would be associated with a
greater number and severity of symptoms of depression
endorsed by the adolescents sampled. Findings revealed
that commute time to and from parents’ present
employment was not associated with Children’s
Depression Inventory scores. However, there was
an inverse relationship between the commute time to
and from the previous jobs of parent respondents’ and
the number and severity of symptoms endorsed by their
children. By contrast, the
present commute time of the spouses of parent
respondents was associated with higher scores on the
Children’s Depression Inventory. The relationship
between Children’s Depression Inventory scores and
other variables was examined under the rubric
of
“compensating resources:” friendship quality,
family income, participation in organized sports, and
residence in a two-parent household. Of these, only
family income was found to be associated with lower
depression scores. A post hoc logistic regression
analysis resulted in a prediction model which
correctly classified 85% of the students as having
depressive symptoms which were “present” or
“negligible” by using four variables: (1) minutes of
previous job commute; (2) Friendship Quality Scale
score; (3) child gender; and (4) spouse total commute
time.
The results of the study suggest the importance of
examining child correlates in relationship to
parental commuting behavior.